Karalee’s Post #75
Our 5Writer’s group has been exploring the ‘it’ factor that some authors have that makes their stories unforgettable. What is ‘it’ that keep readers up all night to read just one more scene, or chapter, or heck, why not stay up and finish the whole thing? There’s nothing better than sacrificing a good night’s sleep to find out ‘what happens’.
So, is ‘it’ the setting? the plot-line? the characters? the genre? or a magic combination that somehow elevates the separate bits into something extraordinary?
To me an unforgettable story is a special combination of the above, plus what the author leaves out and the reader fills in.
Can the ‘it factor’ be part of the reader’s imagination? Is ‘it’ a story told so well that the parts “left up to the reader’s imagination” are just as important as what is written down?
For me unforgettable stories(or movies based on books) have done just that. Take Hitchcock. I can still feel my heart pounding and the fear generated by my 12 year-old imagination while watching The Birds. I was babysitting at the time and was literally too afraid to go up the stairs to check on the three children sleeping there! The plot-line was important, but so was my imagination running away with what would happen if the birds really did get inside? I imagined them pecking out people’s eyes and such. It still haunts me.
The ‘it factor’ is found in all genres, not just mysteries or thrillers or war stories. etc. The ‘it’ factor isn’t genre specific and when the author leaves something to the reader’s imagination it can be either part of the plot-line, &/or the characters &/or the setting. Maybe for a story to become unforgettable the ‘it factor’ needs to be developed in all parts of the story?
The beauty of leaving parts of your story up to your reader’s imagination is that what each reader fills in will be unique to him/her and will depend on his/her own experience. To me this is magical. A writer can write a story that is a bit different for every reader that reads it!
- who hasn’t had a picture of a character in his/her mind that doesn’t match the actor playing that character when a book is made into a movie?
- a setting can be perceived differently by every reader. Take a snowstorm. A reader that’s been caught overnight in a storm will imagine a snowstorm taking place in a book differently than a reader that has only watched from inside a warm house. The author doesn’t need to describe the storm in detail unless it is important to the plot-line.
- much of the violence in stories or movies doesn’t have to be up-front blatant. A terrorist storming into a room full of children with a gun sets up what is or can happen, and the sound of gunfire without the sordid details leaves exactly what happens up to the reader’s imagination. Every reader can imagine it a bit differently depending on his/her own experience, even with the same end result.
- in a romance book (or any romance that takes place in a story) heartbreak can be felt differently by each reader depending on his/her experience
If you think about it, what readers fill in are details dependent on his/her own experiences that are also tied into their emotional reactions to those experiences. This also fits the expectation to have your reader be emotionally involved in the story!
Can an author be taught this special combination of plot, setting, characters and “leaving enough up to the reader’s imagination” to elevate a story from good to unforgettable?
For certain it takes hard work. And lots of it.
Even the best authors admit this.
Have you thought about leaving certain aspects or details up to your reader’s imagination? Do you feel this can make a better story?